Over the past decade, the importance of mobile phones has grown immensely. Having technological solutions on our palms has not only positively contributed in our daily lives but has also become a necessity for businesses. It’s hard to compete in the ever-evolving world without having the right technological tools at the right time. But, are all technological solutions offered on our portable devices the same? Perhaps not. Some applications are better than the other and if we come across something that we can’t find useful, well, who would want to waste that precious storage space.

A bad user experience could easily mean that the application would not be used very often, which makes it an important aspect of technological solutions. To build these mobile technological solutions, there are several programming languages out there and the two broad categories include Native and Hybrid apps. Native apps are written in programming languages specific for each operating system like Objective-C for iOS and Java for Android. Whereas Hybrid apps use a web view to run an application through a native app wrapper that helps the application communicate with the native operating system.

The debate of whether Native apps are better than Hybrid apps has surfaced the internet for a while now. The arguments mostly boil down to how each development technique is beneficial to the user and how it aids the developer as well. Setting aside personal preferences and Native apps offer more expediency than Hybrid apps.

  1. Firstly, Native apps offer a much wider range of functionality as it allows the application to directly utilize hardware of a device. For applications that require a high-speed performance, Native apps works the best
  2. Despite having the advantage of building a hybrid application that could run on multiple platforms, such apps do not allow for a detailed user experience as the difference in the style and usage of Android and iOS platforms is quite evident. Making it an imperative to design native apps so that the technological tools could make the best of it and offer the best user experience.
  3. Hybrid apps require layers to communicate with a device and with an additional new layer in an application, the security risks increase as it allows for an opportunity for a breach. Native apps offer better encryption through standard tools which makes it difficult to copy the code. Whereas Hybrid apps fall behind in this area.
  4. Determining how a native app would work on its platform is much easier than gauging how a hybrid application would work on different platforms. For instance, notifications for a hybrid app may appear differently on Android than on iOS and fully optimizing push notifications becomes tough.
  5. Initially, Native apps may cost higher but in the long run it serves users in such a way that would probably save more than what the additional original investment.

In conclusion, both of the apps have their own pros and cons. The decision mainly lies on how each development procedure aids to the companies needs and targets. If you’re looking for an app that offers the best user experience with optimum security, high performance and if budget is not a problem, you should go for Native apps.